Adbusters Evidence 2 comments Admin, 04 April 2008 2 comments on the article “Evidence” Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 Page 1 of 1 Anonymous 30 May 2008 at 06:40 pm The title of the spot means..... - we can slightly infer that the children are watching TV, but the point is missed. Evidence that concludes.... -it's a bit weak and watered down. Conceptually, you might want to look at it again. Anonymous 30 May 2008 at 06:40 pm The title of the spot means..... - we can slightly infer that the children are watching TV, but the point is missed. Evidence that concludes.... -it's a bit weak and watered down. Conceptually, you might want to look at it again. Add a new comment Comments are closed.
Anonymous 30 May 2008 at 06:40 pm The title of the spot means..... - we can slightly infer that the children are watching TV, but the point is missed. Evidence that concludes.... -it's a bit weak and watered down. Conceptually, you might want to look at it again.
Anonymous 30 May 2008 at 06:40 pm The title of the spot means..... - we can slightly infer that the children are watching TV, but the point is missed. Evidence that concludes.... -it's a bit weak and watered down. Conceptually, you might want to look at it again.
2 comments on the article “Evidence”
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1
Anonymous
The title of the spot means.....
- we can slightly infer that the children are watching TV, but the point is missed. Evidence that concludes....
-it's a bit weak and watered down. Conceptually, you might want to look at it again.
Anonymous
The title of the spot means.....
- we can slightly infer that the children are watching TV, but the point is missed. Evidence that concludes....
-it's a bit weak and watered down. Conceptually, you might want to look at it again.
Add a new comment